Jamaica vs New Zealand: Financial Markets Depth Index
Financial Markets Depth Index over time
- Jamaica
- New Zealand
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 0.4238 against 0.3827 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0411.
That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Jamaica ahead.
Jamaica ranks 43rd and New Zealand ranks 46th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.1022 | 0.146 | 0.0439 | New Zealand |
| 1990s | 0.0907 | 0.2588 | 0.1681 | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 0.2772 | 0.3127 | 0.0355 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 0.3881 | 0.3322 | 0.0559 | Jamaica |
| 2020s | 0.4238 | 0.3827 | 0.0411 | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets depth index, Jamaica or New Zealand?
- Jamaica, at 0.4238 against 0.3827 in New Zealand as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets depth index between Jamaica and New Zealand?
- 0.0411, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and New Zealand?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Jamaica and New Zealand rank globally for financial markets depth index?
- Jamaica ranks 43rd and New Zealand ranks 46th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.