Kazakhstan, Republic of vs Malta: Financial Markets Depth Index
Financial Markets Depth Index over time
- Kazakhstan, Republic of
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0.2153 against 0.2129 in Kazakhstan, Republic of, a difference of 0.0024.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Malta ahead.
Kazakhstan, Republic of ranks 68th and Malta ranks 66th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Kazakhstan, Republic of averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan, Republic of | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0.0551 | 0.0551 | Malta |
| 1990s | 0.019 | 0.19 | 0.171 | Malta |
| 2000s | 0.2068 | 0.2432 | 0.0364 | Malta |
| 2010s | 0.2264 | 0.1686 | 0.0579 | Kazakhstan, Republic of |
| 2020s | 0.2129 | 0.2153 | 0.0024 | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets depth index, Kazakhstan, Republic of or Malta?
- Malta, at 0.2153 against 0.2129 in Kazakhstan, Republic of as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets depth index between Kazakhstan, Republic of and Malta?
- 0.0024, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan, Republic of and Malta?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Kazakhstan, Republic of and Malta rank globally for financial markets depth index?
- Kazakhstan, Republic of ranks 68th and Malta ranks 66th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.