Lebanon vs New Zealand: Financial Markets Depth Index
Financial Markets Depth Index over time
- Lebanon
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0.3827 against 0.3458 in Lebanon, a difference of 0.0369.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Lebanon's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was New Zealand ahead.
Lebanon ranks 49th and New Zealand ranks 46th of 183 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0569 | 0.146 | 0.0891 | New Zealand |
| 1990s | 0.079 | 0.2588 | 0.1798 | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 0.1718 | 0.3127 | 0.1409 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 0.1854 | 0.3322 | 0.1468 | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 0.3458 | 0.3827 | 0.0369 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets depth index, Lebanon or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 0.3827 against 0.3458 in Lebanon as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets depth index between Lebanon and New Zealand?
- 0.0369, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and New Zealand?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Lebanon and New Zealand rank globally for financial markets depth index?
- Lebanon ranks 49th and New Zealand ranks 46th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.