Lesotho vs Myanmar: Financial Markets Depth Index
Financial Markets Depth Index over time
- Lesotho
- Myanmar
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 0.005 against 0.0038 in Myanmar, a difference of 0.0012.
That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.3 times Myanmar's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Lesotho ahead.
Lesotho ranks 148th and Myanmar ranks 151st of 183 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.006 | 0.0007 | 0.0053 | Lesotho |
| 1990s | 0.0067 | 0.001 | 0.0057 | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 0.0065 | 0.0007 | 0.0058 | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 0.0044 | 0.0026 | 0.0019 | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 0.005 | 0.0038 | 0.0012 | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets depth index, Lesotho or Myanmar?
- Lesotho, at 0.005 against 0.0038 in Myanmar as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets depth index between Lesotho and Myanmar?
- 0.0012, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Myanmar?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Lesotho and Myanmar rank globally for financial markets depth index?
- Lesotho ranks 148th and Myanmar ranks 151st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.