Lithuania vs Paraguay: Financial Markets Depth Index
Financial Markets Depth Index over time
- Lithuania
- Paraguay
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 0.0424 against 0.0395 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.0029.
That makes Paraguay's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Paraguay ahead.
Lithuania ranks 115th and Paraguay ranks 112th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 2 and Paraguay in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0.0093 | 0.0093 | Paraguay |
| 1990s | 0.0066 | 0.014 | 0.0074 | Paraguay |
| 2000s | 0.0265 | 0.0159 | 0.0106 | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 0.0337 | 0.026 | 0.0077 | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 0.0395 | 0.0424 | 0.0029 | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets depth index, Lithuania or Paraguay?
- Paraguay, at 0.0424 against 0.0395 in Lithuania as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets depth index between Lithuania and Paraguay?
- 0.0029, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Paraguay?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Lithuania and Paraguay rank globally for financial markets depth index?
- Lithuania ranks 115th and Paraguay ranks 112th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.