Nepal vs Nicaragua: Financial Markets Depth Index
Financial Markets Depth Index over time
- Nepal
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 0.0037 against 0.0016 in Nepal, a difference of 0.0021.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 2.2 times Nepal's.
Across all 41 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.
Nepal ranks 154th and Nicaragua ranks 152nd of 183 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0009 | 0.0022 | 0.0012 | Nicaragua |
| 1990s | 0.0015 | 0.0027 | 0.0013 | Nicaragua |
| 2000s | 0.0021 | 0.0057 | 0.0037 | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 0.0026 | 0.0097 | 0.0071 | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 0.0016 | 0.0037 | 0.002 | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets depth index, Nepal or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 0.0037 against 0.0016 in Nepal as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets depth index between Nepal and Nicaragua?
- 0.0021, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Nicaragua?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Nepal and Nicaragua rank globally for financial markets depth index?
- Nepal ranks 154th and Nicaragua ranks 152nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.