Oman vs Russian Federation: Financial Markets Depth Index
Financial Markets Depth Index over time
- Oman
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Oman currently reports 0.3597 against 0.3379 in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.0218.
That makes Oman's figure about 1.1 times Russian Federation's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Oman ahead.
Oman ranks 48th and Russian Federation ranks 50th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Oman averaged higher in 3 and Russian Federation in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oman | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0434 | 0 | 0.0434 | Oman |
| 1990s | 0.1109 | 0.3228 | 0.2119 | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 0.3086 | 0.4605 | 0.1519 | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 0.3543 | 0.3166 | 0.0377 | Oman |
| 2020s | 0.3597 | 0.3379 | 0.0218 | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets depth index, Oman or Russian Federation?
- Oman, at 0.3597 against 0.3379 in Russian Federation as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets depth index between Oman and Russian Federation?
- 0.0218, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Russian Federation?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Oman and Russian Federation rank globally for financial markets depth index?
- Oman ranks 48th and Russian Federation ranks 50th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.