Advanced Markets vs Brazil: Financial Markets Efficiency Index
Financial Markets Efficiency Index over time
- Advanced Markets
- Brazil
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 1 against 0.4765 in Advanced Markets, a difference of 0.5235.
That makes Brazil's figure about 2.1 times Advanced Markets's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Brazil ahead.
Advanced Markets ranks 1st and Brazil ranks 1st of 9 groups.
Across the 5 decades both report, Advanced Markets averaged higher in 3 and Brazil in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Advanced Markets | Brazil | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.2445 | 0.1838 | 0.0607 | Advanced Markets |
| 1990s | 0.3984 | 0.2733 | 0.1251 | Advanced Markets |
| 2000s | 0.5535 | 0.5285 | 0.025 | Advanced Markets |
| 2010s | 0.5038 | 0.8962 | 0.3924 | Brazil |
| 2020s | 0.4765 | 1 | 0.5235 | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets efficiency index, Advanced Markets or Brazil?
- Brazil, at 1 against 0.4765 in Advanced Markets as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets efficiency index between Advanced Markets and Brazil?
- 0.5235, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Advanced Markets and Brazil?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Advanced Markets and Brazil rank globally for financial markets efficiency index?
- Advanced Markets ranks 1st and Brazil ranks 1st of 9 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.