Advanced Markets vs China: Financial Markets Efficiency Index
Financial Markets Efficiency Index over time
- Advanced Markets
- China
How they compare
China currently reports 1 against 0.4765 in Advanced Markets, a difference of 0.5235.
That makes China's figure about 2.1 times Advanced Markets's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Advanced Markets ahead.
Advanced Markets ranks 1st and China ranks 1st of 9 groups.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Advanced Markets | China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.2445 | 0.4581 | 0.2136 | China |
| 1990s | 0.3984 | 0.8216 | 0.4232 | China |
| 2000s | 0.5535 | 0.9456 | 0.3921 | China |
| 2010s | 0.5038 | 1 | 0.4962 | China |
| 2020s | 0.4765 | 1 | 0.5235 | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets efficiency index, Advanced Markets or China?
- China, at 1 against 0.4765 in Advanced Markets as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets efficiency index between Advanced Markets and China?
- 0.5235, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Advanced Markets and China?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Advanced Markets and China rank globally for financial markets efficiency index?
- Advanced Markets ranks 1st and China ranks 1st of 9 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.