Argentina vs Jordan: Financial Markets Efficiency Index
Financial Markets Efficiency Index over time
- Argentina
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0.0999 against 0.0935 in Argentina, a difference of 0.0064.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Jordan ahead.
Argentina ranks 55th and Jordan ranks 54th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Jordan in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.2994 | 0.7307 | 0.4313 | Jordan |
| 1990s | 0.7207 | 0.6859 | 0.0348 | Argentina |
| 2000s | 0.1288 | 0.6588 | 0.53 | Jordan |
| 2010s | 0.0703 | 0.1611 | 0.0908 | Jordan |
| 2020s | 0.0935 | 0.0999 | 0.0064 | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets efficiency index, Argentina or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 0.0999 against 0.0935 in Argentina as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets efficiency index between Argentina and Jordan?
- 0.0064, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Jordan?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Argentina and Jordan rank globally for financial markets efficiency index?
- Argentina ranks 55th and Jordan ranks 54th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.