Asia and Pacific vs Türkiye: Financial Markets Efficiency Index
Financial Markets Efficiency Index over time
- Asia and Pacific
- Türkiye
How they compare
Türkiye currently reports 1 against 0.2424 in Asia and Pacific, a difference of 0.7576.
That makes Türkiye's figure about 4.1 times Asia and Pacific's.
Across all 41 years both countries report, Türkiye has been ahead every year.
Asia and Pacific ranks 3rd and Türkiye ranks 1st of 9 groups.
Türkiye has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Asia and Pacific | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.138 | 0.2249 | 0.0869 | Türkiye |
| 1990s | 0.2253 | 0.7434 | 0.5181 | Türkiye |
| 2000s | 0.2717 | 1 | 0.7283 | Türkiye |
| 2010s | 0.2272 | 1 | 0.7728 | Türkiye |
| 2020s | 0.2424 | 1 | 0.7576 | Türkiye |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets efficiency index, Asia and Pacific or Türkiye?
- Türkiye, at 1 against 0.2424 in Asia and Pacific as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets efficiency index between Asia and Pacific and Türkiye?
- 0.7576, with Türkiye ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Asia and Pacific and Türkiye?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Asia and Pacific and Türkiye rank globally for financial markets efficiency index?
- Asia and Pacific ranks 3rd and Türkiye ranks 1st of 9 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.