Bangladesh vs United Arab Emirates: Financial Markets Efficiency Index
Financial Markets Efficiency Index over time
- Bangladesh
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 0.2051 against 0.157 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.0481.
That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.3 times United Arab Emirates's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 44th and United Arab Emirates ranks 47th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 2 and United Arab Emirates in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0419 | 0.0514 | 0.0095 | United Arab Emirates |
| 1990s | 0.2184 | 0.0972 | 0.1211 | Bangladesh |
| 2000s | 0.2389 | 0.3601 | 0.1212 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 0.1987 | 0.3142 | 0.1155 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2020s | 0.2051 | 0.157 | 0.0481 | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets efficiency index, Bangladesh or United Arab Emirates?
- Bangladesh, at 0.2051 against 0.157 in United Arab Emirates as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets efficiency index between Bangladesh and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.0481, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and United Arab Emirates?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Bangladesh and United Arab Emirates rank globally for financial markets efficiency index?
- Bangladesh ranks 44th and United Arab Emirates ranks 47th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.