Belarus vs Costa Rica: Financial Markets Efficiency Index
Financial Markets Efficiency Index over time
- Belarus
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 0.0197 against 0.0183 in Belarus, a difference of 0.0014.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Belarus ranks 77th and Costa Rica ranks 74th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Costa Rica in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0.0408 | 0.0408 | Costa Rica |
| 1990s | 0.0214 | 0.0411 | 0.0197 | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 0.0497 | 0.0797 | 0.03 | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 0.0391 | 0.0294 | 0.0097 | Belarus |
| 2020s | 0.0183 | 0.0197 | 0.0013 | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets efficiency index, Belarus or Costa Rica?
- Costa Rica, at 0.0197 against 0.0183 in Belarus as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets efficiency index between Belarus and Costa Rica?
- 0.0014, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Costa Rica?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Belarus and Costa Rica rank globally for financial markets efficiency index?
- Belarus ranks 77th and Costa Rica ranks 74th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.