Belarus vs Malta: Financial Markets Efficiency Index
Financial Markets Efficiency Index over time
- Belarus
- Malta
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0.0183 against 0.0174 in Malta, a difference of 0.0009.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Malta ahead.
Belarus ranks 77th and Malta ranks 79th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Malta in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0.0378 | 0.0378 | Malta |
| 1990s | 0.0214 | 0.0894 | 0.068 | Malta |
| 2000s | 0.0497 | 0.0457 | 0.0041 | Belarus |
| 2010s | 0.0391 | 0.0208 | 0.0183 | Belarus |
| 2020s | 0.0183 | 0.0174 | 0.0009 | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets efficiency index, Belarus or Malta?
- Belarus, at 0.0183 against 0.0174 in Malta as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets efficiency index between Belarus and Malta?
- 0.0009, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Malta?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Belarus and Malta rank globally for financial markets efficiency index?
- Belarus ranks 77th and Malta ranks 79th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.