Botswana vs Paraguay: Financial Markets Efficiency Index
Financial Markets Efficiency Index over time
- Botswana
- Paraguay
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 0.0553 against 0.0472 in Paraguay, a difference of 0.0081.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.2 times Paraguay's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 62nd and Paraguay ranks 65th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 3 and Paraguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.09 | 0.0534 | 0.0366 | Botswana |
| 1990s | 0.1091 | 0.0692 | 0.0399 | Botswana |
| 2000s | 0.0431 | 0.0472 | 0.0041 | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 0.0443 | 0.0472 | 0.0029 | Paraguay |
| 2020s | 0.0553 | 0.0472 | 0.0081 | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets efficiency index, Botswana or Paraguay?
- Botswana, at 0.0553 against 0.0472 in Paraguay as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets efficiency index between Botswana and Paraguay?
- 0.0081, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Paraguay?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Botswana and Paraguay rank globally for financial markets efficiency index?
- Botswana ranks 62nd and Paraguay ranks 65th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.