Brazil vs United States of America: Financial Markets Efficiency Index
Financial Markets Efficiency Index over time
- Brazil
- United States of America
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 1 against 1 in United States of America, a difference of 0.
Across all 41 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 1st and United States of America ranks 1st of 183 countries.
United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | United States of America | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.1838 | 0.7869 | 0.6032 | United States of America |
| 1990s | 0.2733 | 0.8736 | 0.6004 | United States of America |
| 2000s | 0.5285 | 1 | 0.4715 | United States of America |
| 2010s | 0.8962 | 1 | 0.1038 | United States of America |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets efficiency index, Brazil or United States of America?
- Brazil, at 1 against 1 in United States of America as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets efficiency index between Brazil and United States of America?
- 0, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and United States of America?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and United States of America rank globally for financial markets efficiency index?
- Brazil ranks 1st and United States of America ranks 1st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.