Colombia vs Sri Lanka: Financial Markets Efficiency Index
Financial Markets Efficiency Index over time
- Colombia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 0.1323 against 0.1161 in Colombia, a difference of 0.0162.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Colombia's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Colombia ranks 53rd and Sri Lanka ranks 51st of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 2 and Sri Lanka in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0687 | 0.1083 | 0.0396 | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 0.1186 | 0.1305 | 0.0119 | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 0.2663 | 0.2009 | 0.0654 | Colombia |
| 2010s | 0.1473 | 0.1413 | 0.006 | Colombia |
| 2020s | 0.1161 | 0.1323 | 0.0162 | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets efficiency index, Colombia or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 0.1323 against 0.1161 in Colombia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets efficiency index between Colombia and Sri Lanka?
- 0.0162, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Sri Lanka?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Colombia and Sri Lanka rank globally for financial markets efficiency index?
- Colombia ranks 53rd and Sri Lanka ranks 51st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.