Costa Rica vs Namibia: Financial Markets Efficiency Index
Financial Markets Efficiency Index over time
- Costa Rica
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0.0241 against 0.0197 in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.0044.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.2 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 74th and Namibia ranks 72nd of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0408 | 0 | 0.0408 | Costa Rica |
| 1990s | 0.0411 | 0.058 | 0.0169 | Namibia |
| 2000s | 0.0797 | 0.2158 | 0.1361 | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0.0294 | 0.8976 | 0.8681 | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0.0197 | 0.0241 | 0.0045 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets efficiency index, Costa Rica or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 0.0241 against 0.0197 in Costa Rica as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets efficiency index between Costa Rica and Namibia?
- 0.0044, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Namibia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Namibia rank globally for financial markets efficiency index?
- Costa Rica ranks 74th and Namibia ranks 72nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.