Denmark vs Malaysia: Financial Markets Efficiency Index
Financial Markets Efficiency Index over time
- Denmark
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 0.703 against 0.5561 in Denmark, a difference of 0.1469.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.3 times Denmark's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Malaysia ahead.
Denmark ranks 22nd and Malaysia ranks 19th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 3 and Malaysia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.114 | 0.1754 | 0.0613 | Malaysia |
| 1990s | 0.5808 | 0.2656 | 0.3152 | Denmark |
| 2000s | 0.6255 | 0.3899 | 0.2356 | Denmark |
| 2010s | 0.5561 | 0.363 | 0.1931 | Denmark |
| 2020s | 0.5561 | 0.703 | 0.1468 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets efficiency index, Denmark or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 0.703 against 0.5561 in Denmark as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets efficiency index between Denmark and Malaysia?
- 0.1469, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Malaysia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Denmark and Malaysia rank globally for financial markets efficiency index?
- Denmark ranks 22nd and Malaysia ranks 19th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.