Ecuador vs Paraguay: Financial Markets Efficiency Index
Financial Markets Efficiency Index over time
- Ecuador
- Paraguay
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 0.0472 against 0.0302 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.017.
That makes Paraguay's figure about 1.6 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 67th and Paraguay ranks 65th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Paraguay in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0752 | 0.0534 | 0.0218 | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 0.0552 | 0.0692 | 0.0139 | Paraguay |
| 2000s | 0.0302 | 0.0472 | 0.017 | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 0.0302 | 0.0472 | 0.017 | Paraguay |
| 2020s | 0.0302 | 0.0472 | 0.017 | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets efficiency index, Ecuador or Paraguay?
- Paraguay, at 0.0472 against 0.0302 in Ecuador as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets efficiency index between Ecuador and Paraguay?
- 0.017, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Paraguay?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Paraguay rank globally for financial markets efficiency index?
- Ecuador ranks 67th and Paraguay ranks 65th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.