Ghana vs Tanzania: Financial Markets Efficiency Index
Financial Markets Efficiency Index over time
- Ghana
- Tanzania
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 0.0044 against 0.0035 in Tanzania, a difference of 0.0009.
That makes Ghana's figure about 1.2 times Tanzania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Ghana ahead.
Ghana ranks 86th and Tanzania ranks 87th of 183 countries.
Ghana has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0308 | 0.0005 | 0.0304 | Ghana |
| 1990s | 0.0367 | 0.0004 | 0.0363 | Ghana |
| 2000s | 0.0792 | 0.0225 | 0.0568 | Ghana |
| 2010s | 0.0954 | 0.0221 | 0.0733 | Ghana |
| 2020s | 0.0044 | 0.0035 | 0.0008 | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets efficiency index, Ghana or Tanzania?
- Ghana, at 0.0044 against 0.0035 in Tanzania as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets efficiency index between Ghana and Tanzania?
- 0.0009, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Tanzania?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Ghana and Tanzania rank globally for financial markets efficiency index?
- Ghana ranks 86th and Tanzania ranks 87th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.