India vs United Kingdom: Financial Markets Efficiency Index
Financial Markets Efficiency Index over time
- India
- United Kingdom
How they compare
India currently reports 0.9252 against 0.8148 in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.1104.
That makes India's figure about 1.1 times United Kingdom's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was United Kingdom ahead.
India ranks 13th and United Kingdom ranks 15th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, India averaged higher in 3 and United Kingdom in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.2419 | 0.4234 | 0.1815 | United Kingdom |
| 1990s | 0.9467 | 0.4788 | 0.4679 | India |
| 2000s | 0.9449 | 0.852 | 0.0929 | India |
| 2010s | 0.6273 | 0.8339 | 0.2066 | United Kingdom |
| 2020s | 0.9252 | 0.8148 | 0.1104 | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets efficiency index, India or United Kingdom?
- India, at 0.9252 against 0.8148 in United Kingdom as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets efficiency index between India and United Kingdom?
- 0.1104, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and United Kingdom?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do India and United Kingdom rank globally for financial markets efficiency index?
- India ranks 13th and United Kingdom ranks 15th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.