Kazakhstan vs Zambia: Financial Markets Efficiency Index
Financial Markets Efficiency Index over time
- Kazakhstan
- Zambia
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0.0107 against 0.0079 in Zambia, a difference of 0.0028.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.3 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Zambia ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 82nd and Zambia ranks 84th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 4 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0.0009 | 0.0009 | Zambia |
| 1990s | 0.0179 | 0.007 | 0.0109 | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 0.1468 | 0.0105 | 0.1363 | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0.0382 | 0.0077 | 0.0305 | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0.0107 | 0.0079 | 0.0027 | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets efficiency index, Kazakhstan or Zambia?
- Kazakhstan, at 0.0107 against 0.0079 in Zambia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets efficiency index between Kazakhstan and Zambia?
- 0.0028, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Zambia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Kazakhstan and Zambia rank globally for financial markets efficiency index?
- Kazakhstan ranks 82nd and Zambia ranks 84th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.