Mauritius vs Slovenia: Financial Markets Efficiency Index
Financial Markets Efficiency Index over time
- Mauritius
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 0.0675 against 0.0623 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0052.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 60th and Slovenia ranks 58th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.077 | 0 | 0.077 | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 0.0718 | 0.2133 | 0.1415 | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 0.0722 | 0.1521 | 0.0799 | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 0.0599 | 0.0755 | 0.0156 | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 0.0623 | 0.0675 | 0.0052 | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets efficiency index, Mauritius or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 0.0675 against 0.0623 in Mauritius as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets efficiency index between Mauritius and Slovenia?
- 0.0052, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Slovenia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Mauritius and Slovenia rank globally for financial markets efficiency index?
- Mauritius ranks 60th and Slovenia ranks 58th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.