Mexico vs South Africa: Financial Markets Efficiency Index
Financial Markets Efficiency Index over time
- Mexico
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 0.3449 against 0.2555 in Mexico, a difference of 0.0894.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.4 times Mexico's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Mexico ahead.
Mexico ranks 41st and South Africa ranks 38th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 3 and South Africa in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.7659 | 0.0602 | 0.7056 | Mexico |
| 1990s | 0.4284 | 0.1468 | 0.2817 | Mexico |
| 2000s | 0.347 | 0.3301 | 0.0168 | Mexico |
| 2010s | 0.3103 | 0.3674 | 0.0572 | South Africa |
| 2020s | 0.2555 | 0.3449 | 0.0895 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets efficiency index, Mexico or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 0.3449 against 0.2555 in Mexico as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets efficiency index between Mexico and South Africa?
- 0.0894, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and South Africa?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Mexico and South Africa rank globally for financial markets efficiency index?
- Mexico ranks 41st and South Africa ranks 38th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.