Netherlands vs Sweden: Financial Markets Efficiency Index
Financial Markets Efficiency Index over time
- Netherlands
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 0.5369 against 0.5041 in Netherlands, a difference of 0.0328.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Netherlands's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Netherlands ahead.
Netherlands ranks 24th and Sweden ranks 23rd of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Netherlands averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Netherlands | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.3679 | 0.2999 | 0.068 | Netherlands |
| 1990s | 0.514 | 0.6024 | 0.0884 | Sweden |
| 2000s | 1 | 0.8915 | 0.1085 | Netherlands |
| 2010s | 0.7752 | 0.8142 | 0.039 | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0.5041 | 0.5369 | 0.0328 | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets efficiency index, Netherlands or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 0.5369 against 0.5041 in Netherlands as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets efficiency index between Netherlands and Sweden?
- 0.0328, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and Sweden?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Netherlands and Sweden rank globally for financial markets efficiency index?
- Netherlands ranks 24th and Sweden ranks 23rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.