New Zealand vs Qatar: Financial Markets Efficiency Index
Financial Markets Efficiency Index over time
- New Zealand
- Qatar
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0.2073 against 0.173 in Qatar, a difference of 0.0343.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.2 times Qatar's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Qatar ahead.
New Zealand ranks 43rd and Qatar ranks 46th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Qatar in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.1127 | 0.2726 | 0.1599 | Qatar |
| 1990s | 0.3518 | 0.3851 | 0.0333 | Qatar |
| 2000s | 0.2438 | 0.5747 | 0.331 | Qatar |
| 2010s | 0.1379 | 0.3647 | 0.2267 | Qatar |
| 2020s | 0.2073 | 0.173 | 0.0343 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets efficiency index, New Zealand or Qatar?
- New Zealand, at 0.2073 against 0.173 in Qatar as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets efficiency index between New Zealand and Qatar?
- 0.0343, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Qatar?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do New Zealand and Qatar rank globally for financial markets efficiency index?
- New Zealand ranks 43rd and Qatar ranks 46th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.