Paraguay vs Peru: Financial Markets Efficiency Index
Financial Markets Efficiency Index over time
- Paraguay
- Peru
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 0.0472 against 0.0299 in Peru, a difference of 0.0173.
That makes Paraguay's figure about 1.6 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Peru ahead.
Paraguay ranks 65th and Peru ranks 68th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Paraguay averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Paraguay | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0534 | 0.1994 | 0.146 | Peru |
| 1990s | 0.0692 | 0.2667 | 0.1975 | Peru |
| 2000s | 0.0472 | 0.116 | 0.0688 | Peru |
| 2010s | 0.0472 | 0.0474 | 0.0002 | Peru |
| 2020s | 0.0472 | 0.0299 | 0.0173 | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets efficiency index, Paraguay or Peru?
- Paraguay, at 0.0472 against 0.0299 in Peru as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets efficiency index between Paraguay and Peru?
- 0.0173, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Peru?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Paraguay and Peru rank globally for financial markets efficiency index?
- Paraguay ranks 65th and Peru ranks 68th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.