Philippines vs Serbia: Financial Markets Efficiency Index
Financial Markets Efficiency Index over time
- Philippines
- Serbia
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 0.1481 against 0.1165 in Serbia, a difference of 0.0316.
That makes Philippines's figure about 1.3 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Philippines ahead.
Philippines ranks 49th and Serbia ranks 52nd of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 4 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.3177 | 0 | 0.3177 | Philippines |
| 1990s | 0.4107 | 0.3141 | 0.0966 | Philippines |
| 2000s | 0.206 | 0.289 | 0.0831 | Serbia |
| 2010s | 0.1819 | 0.1141 | 0.0677 | Philippines |
| 2020s | 0.1481 | 0.1165 | 0.0317 | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets efficiency index, Philippines or Serbia?
- Philippines, at 0.1481 against 0.1165 in Serbia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets efficiency index between Philippines and Serbia?
- 0.0316, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Serbia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Philippines and Serbia rank globally for financial markets efficiency index?
- Philippines ranks 49th and Serbia ranks 52nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.