Rwanda vs Slovakia: Financial Markets Efficiency Index
Financial Markets Efficiency Index over time
- Rwanda
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 0.0024 against 0 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0024.
That makes Slovakia's figure about 122.8 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Rwanda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 93rd and Slovakia ranks 90th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and Slovakia in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | Rwanda |
| 1990s | 0 | 0.0263 | 0.0263 | Slovakia |
| 2000s | 0 | 0.0195 | 0.0195 | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 0 | 0.0238 | 0.0238 | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 0 | 0.0024 | 0.0023 | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets efficiency index, Rwanda or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at 0.0024 against 0 in Rwanda as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets efficiency index between Rwanda and Slovakia?
- 0.0024, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Slovakia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Rwanda and Slovakia rank globally for financial markets efficiency index?
- Rwanda ranks 93rd and Slovakia ranks 90th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.