El Salvador vs Guatemala: Financial Markets Index
Financial Markets Index over time
- El Salvador
- Guatemala
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 0.0196 against 0.017 in Guatemala, a difference of 0.0026.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.2 times Guatemala's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Guatemala ahead.
El Salvador ranks 115th and Guatemala ranks 118th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 3 and Guatemala in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.003 | 0.0144 | 0.0113 | Guatemala |
| 1990s | 0.0066 | 0.0077 | 0.0012 | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 0.0199 | 0.0083 | 0.0116 | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 0.0212 | 0.0103 | 0.0109 | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 0.0196 | 0.017 | 0.0026 | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets index, El Salvador or Guatemala?
- El Salvador, at 0.0196 against 0.017 in Guatemala as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets index between El Salvador and Guatemala?
- 0.0026, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Guatemala?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do El Salvador and Guatemala rank globally for financial markets index?
- El Salvador ranks 115th and Guatemala ranks 118th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.