Hong Kong, China vs Malaysia: Financial Markets Index
Financial Markets Index over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Malaysia
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 0.7433 against 0.7356 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.0077.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Malaysia ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 11th and Malaysia ranks 13th of 183 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.2853 | 0.184 | 0.1013 | Hong Kong, China |
| 1990s | 0.5675 | 0.3457 | 0.2217 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2000s | 0.7218 | 0.5478 | 0.174 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 0.7362 | 0.6051 | 0.1311 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2020s | 0.7433 | 0.7356 | 0.0078 | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets index, Hong Kong, China or Malaysia?
- Hong Kong, China, at 0.7433 against 0.7356 in Malaysia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets index between Hong Kong, China and Malaysia?
- 0.0077, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Malaysia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Malaysia rank globally for financial markets index?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 11th and Malaysia ranks 13th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.