Iceland vs Indonesia: Financial Markets Index
Financial Markets Index over time
- Iceland
- Indonesia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 0.3112 against 0.2842 in Iceland, a difference of 0.027.
That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Indonesia ahead.
Iceland ranks 56th and Indonesia ranks 53rd of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Indonesia in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.1679 | 0.2845 | 0.1165 | Indonesia |
| 1990s | 0.195 | 0.3143 | 0.1193 | Indonesia |
| 2000s | 0.3276 | 0.3414 | 0.0138 | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 0.3035 | 0.2806 | 0.0229 | Iceland |
| 2020s | 0.2842 | 0.3112 | 0.027 | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets index, Iceland or Indonesia?
- Indonesia, at 0.3112 against 0.2842 in Iceland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets index between Iceland and Indonesia?
- 0.027, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Indonesia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Iceland and Indonesia rank globally for financial markets index?
- Iceland ranks 56th and Indonesia ranks 53rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.