Kyrgyzstan vs Mauritania: Financial Markets Index
Financial Markets Index over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Mauritania
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 0.0075 against 0.0069 in Mauritania, a difference of 0.0006.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Mauritania ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 133rd and Mauritania ranks 134th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 3 and Mauritania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0.0099 | 0.0099 | Mauritania |
| 1990s | 0.0133 | 0.01 | 0.0033 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 0.0161 | 0.0112 | 0.0048 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 0.0081 | 0.0084 | 0.0002 | Mauritania |
| 2020s | 0.0075 | 0.0069 | 0.0006 | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets index, Kyrgyzstan or Mauritania?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 0.0075 against 0.0069 in Mauritania as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets index between Kyrgyzstan and Mauritania?
- 0.0006, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Mauritania?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Mauritania rank globally for financial markets index?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 133rd and Mauritania ranks 134th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.