Luxembourg vs Saudi Arabia: Financial Markets Index
Financial Markets Index over time
- Luxembourg
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 0.5666 against 0.538 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.0286.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Saudi Arabia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 28th and Saudi Arabia ranks 31st of 183 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.3685 | 0.3365 | 0.0319 | Luxembourg |
| 1990s | 0.5158 | 0.295 | 0.2208 | Luxembourg |
| 2000s | 0.6076 | 0.4983 | 0.1093 | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 0.5907 | 0.5812 | 0.0096 | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 0.5666 | 0.538 | 0.0286 | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets index, Luxembourg or Saudi Arabia?
- Luxembourg, at 0.5666 against 0.538 in Saudi Arabia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets index between Luxembourg and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.0286, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Saudi Arabia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Luxembourg and Saudi Arabia rank globally for financial markets index?
- Luxembourg ranks 28th and Saudi Arabia ranks 31st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.