Which has higher foreign assets, net foreign assets, Belarus or Tanzania, United Republic of?

Tanzania, United Republic of, at 4.08 trillion against 3.10 trillion in Belarus as of 2008.

What is the difference in foreign assets, net foreign assets between Belarus and Tanzania, United Republic of?

977.24 billion, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Tanzania, United Republic of?

15 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2008.

Where does this data come from?

International Monetary Fund, published as Foreign Assets, Net Foreign Assets (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belarus vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Foreign Assets, Net Foreign Assets

Belarus

3.10 trillion

in 2008

Tanzania, United Republic of

4.08 trillion

in 2008

Belarus rank

26th

Tanzania, United Republic of rank

23rd

Foreign Assets, Net Foreign Assets over time

Belarus
Tanzania, United Republic of

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 4.08 trillion against 3.10 trillion in Belarus, a difference of 977.24 billion.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.3 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 26th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 23rd of 178 countries.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belarus	Tanzania, United Republic of	Difference	Ahead
1990s	24.84 billion	57.09 billion	32.25 billion	Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s	2.02 trillion	2.47 trillion	453.21 billion	Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher foreign assets, net foreign assets, Belarus or Tanzania, United Republic of?: Tanzania, United Republic of, at 4.08 trillion against 3.10 trillion in Belarus as of 2008.
What is the difference in foreign assets, net foreign assets between Belarus and Tanzania, United Republic of?: 977.24 billion, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Tanzania, United Republic of?: 15 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2008.
How do Belarus and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for foreign assets, net foreign assets?: Belarus ranks 26th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 23rd of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?: International Monetary Fund, published as Foreign Assets, Net Foreign Assets (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Foreign Assets, Net Foreign Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-assets-net-foreign-assets-depository-corporations-survey-domestic-currency/belarus/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-assets-net-foreign-assets-depository-corporations-survey-domestic-currency/belarus/tanzania/">Belarus vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Foreign Assets, Net Foreign Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Foreign Assets, Net Foreign Assets (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency)
Source: International Monetary Fund
Licence: IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage: 181 places, 7,519 data points, 1950–2024
Last refreshed: 19 August 2026

The Monetary and Financial Statistics (MFS), Non-standard dataset provides discontinued, vintage country-reported financial data that are not harmonized and use country-specific terms.