Botswana vs Poland: Foreign Assets, Net Foreign Assets
Botswana
72.78 billion
in 2008
Poland
64.21 billion
in 2008
Botswana rank
97th
Poland rank
100th
Foreign Assets, Net Foreign Assets over time
- Botswana
- Poland
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 72.78 billion against 64.21 billion in Poland, a difference of 8.57 billion.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 97th and Poland ranks 100th of 178 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Poland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 212.49 million | -10.00 million | 222.49 million | Botswana |
| 1980s | 1.86 billion | 96.92 million | 1.76 billion | Botswana |
| 1990s | 15.50 billion | 47.27 billion | 31.77 billion | Poland |
| 2000s | 41.92 billion | 134.82 billion | 92.90 billion | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher foreign assets, net foreign assets, Botswana or Poland?
- Botswana, at 72.78 billion against 64.21 billion in Poland as of 2008.
- What is the difference in foreign assets, net foreign assets between Botswana and Poland?
- 8.57 billion, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Poland?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2008.
- How do Botswana and Poland rank globally for foreign assets, net foreign assets?
- Botswana ranks 97th and Poland ranks 100th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Foreign Assets, Net Foreign Assets (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Monetary and Financial Statistics (MFS), Non-standard dataset provides discontinued, vintage country-reported financial data that are not harmonized and use country-specific terms.