Eswatini vs Jordan: Foreign Assets, Net Foreign Assets
Eswatini
8.04 billion
in 2008
Jordan
8.52 billion
in 2016
Eswatini rank
124th
Jordan rank
123rd
Foreign Assets, Net Foreign Assets over time
- Eswatini
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 8.52 billion against 8.04 billion in Eswatini, a difference of 477.28 million.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Jordan ahead.
Eswatini ranks 124th and Jordan ranks 123rd of 178 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 55.98 million | 226.72 million | 170.74 million | Jordan |
| 1980s | 188.23 million | 429.09 million | 240.86 million | Jordan |
| 1990s | 800.63 million | 1.69 billion | 886.50 million | Jordan |
| 2000s | 2.82 billion | 5.66 billion | 2.85 billion | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher foreign assets, net foreign assets, Eswatini or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 8.52 billion against 8.04 billion in Eswatini as of 2016.
- What is the difference in foreign assets, net foreign assets between Eswatini and Jordan?
- 477.28 million, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Jordan?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2008.
- How do Eswatini and Jordan rank globally for foreign assets, net foreign assets?
- Eswatini ranks 124th and Jordan ranks 123rd of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Foreign Assets, Net Foreign Assets (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Monetary and Financial Statistics (MFS), Non-standard dataset provides discontinued, vintage country-reported financial data that are not harmonized and use country-specific terms.