Brazil vs South Sudan: GDP deflator: linked series
GDP deflator: linked series over time
- Brazil
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 270.49 base year varies by country against 269.14 base year varies by country in Brazil, a difference of 1.35 base year varies by country.
Across all 8 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 32nd and South Sudan ranks 31st of 214 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89.09 base year varies by country | 106.71 base year varies by country | 17.62 base year varies by country | South Sudan |
| 2010s | 122.05 base year varies by country | 218.88 base year varies by country | 96.83 base year varies by country | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp deflator: linked series, Brazil or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 270.49 base year varies by country against 269.14 base year varies by country in Brazil as of 2015.
- What is the difference in gdp deflator: linked series between Brazil and South Sudan?
- 1.35 base year varies by country, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2015.
- How do Brazil and South Sudan rank globally for gdp deflator: linked series?
- Brazil ranks 32nd and South Sudan ranks 31st of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as GDP deflator: linked series (base year varies by country). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The GDP implicit deflator is the ratio of GDP in current local currency to GDP in constant local currency. The base year varies by country. This series has been linked to produce a consistent time series to counteract breaks in series over time due to changes in base years, source data and methodologies. Thus, it may not be comparable with other national accounts series in the database for historical years. This indicator is expressed as a ratio (a÷b).