Cuba vs Norway: Gold reserves at market value (SDR), annual growth rate
Cuba
-100 % change on previous year
in 1961
Norway
-100 % change on previous year
in 2004
Cuba rank
123rd
Norway rank
123rd
Gold reserves at market value (SDR), annual growth rate over time
- Cuba
- Norway
How they compare
Cuba currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Norway, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 123rd and Norway ranks 123rd of 142 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | -14.9 % change on previous year | -4.61 % change on previous year | 10.28 % change on previous year | Norway |
| 1960s | -98.98 % change on previous year | 0.1182 % change on previous year | 99.1 % change on previous year | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gold reserves at market value (sdr), annual growth rate, Cuba or Norway?
- Cuba, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Norway as of 1961.
- What is the difference in gold reserves at market value (sdr), annual growth rate between Cuba and Norway?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Norway?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 1961.
- How do Cuba and Norway rank globally for gold reserves at market value (sdr), annual growth rate?
- Cuba ranks 123rd and Norway ranks 123rd of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gold reserves at market value (SDR), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Gold reserves at market value (SDR). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.