Israel vs Tanzania: Gold reserves at market value (SDR), per capita (reserves capita)
Israel
0 SDR per person
in 2018
Tanzania
0 SDR per person
in 2014
Israel rank
117th
Tanzania rank
117th
Gold reserves at market value (SDR), per capita (reserves capita) over time
- Israel
- Tanzania
How they compare
Israel currently reports 0 SDR per person against 0 SDR per person in Tanzania, a difference of 0 SDR per person.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Tanzania has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 117th and Tanzania ranks 117th of 159 countries.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2243 SDR per person | 0.5449 SDR per person | 0.3206 SDR per person | Tanzania |
| 2000s | 0 SDR per person | 0.1453 SDR per person | 0.1453 SDR per person | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 0 SDR per person | 0 SDR per person | 0 SDR per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gold reserves at market value (sdr), per capita, Israel or Tanzania?
- Israel, at 0 SDR per person against 0 SDR per person in Tanzania as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gold reserves at market value (sdr), per capita between Israel and Tanzania?
- 0 SDR per person, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Tanzania?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2014.
- How do Israel and Tanzania rank globally for gold reserves at market value (sdr), per capita?
- Israel ranks 117th and Tanzania ranks 117th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gold reserves at market value (SDR), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gold reserves at market value (SDR) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.