Norway vs Rwanda: Gold reserves at market value (SDR), per capita
Norway
0 SDR per person
in 2025
Rwanda
0 SDR per person
in 2004
Norway rank
117th
Rwanda rank
117th
Gold reserves at market value (SDR), per capita over time
- Norway
- Rwanda
How they compare
Norway currently reports 0 SDR per person against 0 SDR per person in Rwanda, a difference of 0 SDR per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Norway ahead.
Norway ranks 117th and Rwanda ranks 117th of 159 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 65.91 SDR per person | 0.0842 SDR per person | 65.83 SDR per person | Norway |
| 1980s | 98.96 SDR per person | 0 SDR per person | 98.96 SDR per person | Norway |
| 1990s | 65.9 SDR per person | 0 SDR per person | 65.9 SDR per person | Norway |
| 2000s | 50.28 SDR per person | 0 SDR per person | 50.28 SDR per person | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gold reserves at market value (sdr), per capita, Norway or Rwanda?
- Norway, at 0 SDR per person against 0 SDR per person in Rwanda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gold reserves at market value (sdr), per capita between Norway and Rwanda?
- 0 SDR per person, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Rwanda?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2004.
- How do Norway and Rwanda rank globally for gold reserves at market value (sdr), per capita?
- Norway ranks 117th and Rwanda ranks 117th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gold reserves at market value (SDR), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gold reserves at market value (SDR) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.