Cape Verde vs Rwanda: Gold reserves at market value (SDR), per unit of GDP
Cape Verde
0 SDR per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Rwanda
0 SDR per US$ of GDP
in 2004
Cape Verde rank
117th
Rwanda rank
117th
Gold reserves at market value (SDR), per unit of GDP over time
- Cape Verde
- Rwanda
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 0 SDR per US$ of GDP against 0 SDR per US$ of GDP in Rwanda, a difference of 0 SDR per US$ of GDP.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Cape Verde ranks 117th and Rwanda ranks 117th of 159 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 SDR per US$ of GDP | 0 SDR per US$ of GDP | 0 SDR per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1990s | 0 SDR per US$ of GDP | 0 SDR per US$ of GDP | 0 SDR per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2000s | 0 SDR per US$ of GDP | 0 SDR per US$ of GDP | 0 SDR per US$ of GDP | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gold reserves at market value (sdr), per unit of gdp, Cape Verde or Rwanda?
- Cape Verde, at 0 SDR per US$ of GDP against 0 SDR per US$ of GDP in Rwanda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gold reserves at market value (sdr), per unit of gdp between Cape Verde and Rwanda?
- 0 SDR per US$ of GDP, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Rwanda?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2004.
- How do Cape Verde and Rwanda rank globally for gold reserves at market value (sdr), per unit of gdp?
- Cape Verde ranks 117th and Rwanda ranks 117th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gold reserves at market value (SDR), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gold reserves at market value (SDR) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.