Congo vs Montenegro: Gold reserves at market value (SDR), per unit of GDP
Congo
0 SDR per US$ of GDP
in 2018
Montenegro
0 SDR per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Congo rank
117th
Montenegro rank
117th
Gold reserves at market value (SDR), per unit of GDP over time
- Congo
- Montenegro
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0 SDR per US$ of GDP against 0 SDR per US$ of GDP in Montenegro, a difference of 0 SDR per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 117th and Montenegro ranks 117th of 159 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0006 SDR per US$ of GDP | 0.0007 SDR per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 SDR per US$ of GDP | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 0 SDR per US$ of GDP | 0 SDR per US$ of GDP | 0 SDR per US$ of GDP | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gold reserves at market value (sdr), per unit of gdp, Congo or Montenegro?
- Congo, at 0 SDR per US$ of GDP against 0 SDR per US$ of GDP in Montenegro as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gold reserves at market value (sdr), per unit of gdp between Congo and Montenegro?
- 0 SDR per US$ of GDP, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Montenegro?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2018.
- How do Congo and Montenegro rank globally for gold reserves at market value (sdr), per unit of gdp?
- Congo ranks 117th and Montenegro ranks 117th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gold reserves at market value (SDR), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gold reserves at market value (SDR) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.