Azerbaijan vs Tajikistan: Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of)

Azerbaijan
9.60 billion
in 2030
Tajikistan
6.71 billion
in 2030
Azerbaijan rank
18th
Tajikistan rank
20th

Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of) over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Tajikistan
05.0B10.0B15.0B200020152030

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 9.60 billion against 6.71 billion in Tajikistan, a difference of 2.89 billion.

That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 1.4 times Tajikistan's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Azerbaijan has been ahead every year.

Azerbaijan ranks 18th and Tajikistan ranks 20th of 29 countries.

Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Tajikistan Difference Ahead
2000s 2.38 billion 102.74 million 2.28 billion Azerbaijan
2010s 8.36 billion 768.37 million 7.60 billion Azerbaijan
2020s 9.92 billion 4.45 billion 5.48 billion Azerbaijan
2030s 9.60 billion 6.71 billion 2.89 billion Azerbaijan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross international reserves, central bank, us dollar (balance of), Azerbaijan or Tajikistan?
Azerbaijan, at 9.60 billion against 6.71 billion in Tajikistan as of 2030.
What is the difference in gross international reserves, central bank, us dollar (balance of) between Azerbaijan and Tajikistan?
2.89 billion, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Tajikistan?
31 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2030.
How do Azerbaijan and Tajikistan rank globally for gross international reserves, central bank, us dollar (balance of)?
Azerbaijan ranks 18th and Tajikistan ranks 20th of 29 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6)). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs Tajikistan: Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/gross-international-reserves-central-bank-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international/azerbaijan/tajikistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/gross-international-reserves-central-bank-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international/azerbaijan/tajikistan/">Azerbaijan vs Tajikistan: Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6))
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
42 places, 1,258 data points, 2000–2030
Last refreshed

The Middle East and Central Asia Department Regional Economic Outlook (MCDREO) provides information on recent economic developments and prospects for 32 countries and territories: Afghanistan, Algeria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Djibouti, Egypt, Georgia, Islamic Republic of Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, West Bank and Gaza, and Yemen. These countries and territories are divided into two main nonoverlapping groups, based on export earnings, namely (1) oil exporters; and (2) oil importers. The oil importers group comprises (1) emerging market and middle-income countries (EM&MI) and (2) low-income countries (LICs) based on the income level. Additional analytical and regional groups might be used to provide a more granular breakdown for analysis and continuity.