Djibouti vs Sudan: Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of)

Djibouti
609.01 million
in 2030
Sudan
1.08 billion
in 2030
Djibouti rank
29th
Sudan rank
28th

Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of) over time

  • Djibouti
  • Sudan
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B2.5B200020152030

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 1.08 billion against 609.01 million in Djibouti, a difference of 470.14 million.

That makes Sudan's figure about 1.8 times Djibouti's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Djibouti ahead.

Djibouti ranks 29th and Sudan ranks 28th of 29 countries.

Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Djibouti Sudan Difference Ahead
2000s 108.66 million 1.23 billion 1.12 billion Sudan
2010s 373.49 million 659.06 million 285.58 million Sudan
2020s 508.41 million 1.24 billion 735.63 million Sudan
2030s 609.01 million 1.08 billion 470.14 million Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross international reserves, central bank, us dollar (balance of), Djibouti or Sudan?
Sudan, at 1.08 billion against 609.01 million in Djibouti as of 2030.
What is the difference in gross international reserves, central bank, us dollar (balance of) between Djibouti and Sudan?
470.14 million, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Sudan?
31 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2030.
How do Djibouti and Sudan rank globally for gross international reserves, central bank, us dollar (balance of)?
Djibouti ranks 29th and Sudan ranks 28th of 29 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6)). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Djibouti vs Sudan: Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/gross-international-reserves-central-bank-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international/djibouti/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/gross-international-reserves-central-bank-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international/djibouti/sudan/">Djibouti vs Sudan: Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6))
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
42 places, 1,258 data points, 2000–2030
Last refreshed

The Middle East and Central Asia Department Regional Economic Outlook (MCDREO) provides information on recent economic developments and prospects for 32 countries and territories: Afghanistan, Algeria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Djibouti, Egypt, Georgia, Islamic Republic of Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, West Bank and Gaza, and Yemen. These countries and territories are divided into two main nonoverlapping groups, based on export earnings, namely (1) oil exporters; and (2) oil importers. The oil importers group comprises (1) emerging market and middle-income countries (EM&MI) and (2) low-income countries (LICs) based on the income level. Additional analytical and regional groups might be used to provide a more granular breakdown for analysis and continuity.