Egypt vs Kazakhstan: Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of)

Egypt
45.41 billion
in 2030
Kazakhstan
59.30 billion
in 2030
Egypt rank
10th
Kazakhstan rank
7th

Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of) over time

  • Egypt
  • Kazakhstan
020.0B40.0B60.0B200020152030

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 59.30 billion against 45.41 billion in Egypt, a difference of 13.89 billion.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.3 times Egypt's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Egypt ahead.

Egypt ranks 10th and Kazakhstan ranks 7th of 29 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
2000s 21.16 billion 10.88 billion 10.28 billion Egypt
2010s 26.21 billion 28.95 billion 2.74 billion Kazakhstan
2020s 42.96 billion 47.60 billion 4.63 billion Kazakhstan
2030s 45.41 billion 59.30 billion 13.89 billion Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross international reserves, central bank, us dollar (balance of), Egypt or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at 59.30 billion against 45.41 billion in Egypt as of 2030.
What is the difference in gross international reserves, central bank, us dollar (balance of) between Egypt and Kazakhstan?
13.89 billion, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Kazakhstan?
31 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2030.
How do Egypt and Kazakhstan rank globally for gross international reserves, central bank, us dollar (balance of)?
Egypt ranks 10th and Kazakhstan ranks 7th of 29 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6)). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Kazakhstan: Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/gross-international-reserves-central-bank-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international/egypt-arab-rep/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/gross-international-reserves-central-bank-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international/egypt-arab-rep/kazakhstan/">Egypt vs Kazakhstan: Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6))
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
42 places, 1,258 data points, 2000–2030
Last refreshed

The Middle East and Central Asia Department Regional Economic Outlook (MCDREO) provides information on recent economic developments and prospects for 32 countries and territories: Afghanistan, Algeria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Djibouti, Egypt, Georgia, Islamic Republic of Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, West Bank and Gaza, and Yemen. These countries and territories are divided into two main nonoverlapping groups, based on export earnings, namely (1) oil exporters; and (2) oil importers. The oil importers group comprises (1) emerging market and middle-income countries (EM&MI) and (2) low-income countries (LICs) based on the income level. Additional analytical and regional groups might be used to provide a more granular breakdown for analysis and continuity.