Georgia vs Kyrgyzstan: Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of)

Georgia
7.31 billion
in 2030
Kyrgyzstan
5.43 billion
in 2030
Georgia rank
19th
Kyrgyzstan rank
22nd

Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of) over time

  • Georgia
  • Kyrgyzstan
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B200020152030

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 7.31 billion against 5.43 billion in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 1.88 billion.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.3 times Kyrgyzstan's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.

Georgia ranks 19th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 22nd of 29 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Kyrgyzstan Difference Ahead
2000s 742.06 million 724.52 million 17.54 million Georgia
2010s 2.86 billion 1.96 billion 895.75 million Georgia
2020s 5.26 billion 4.41 billion 848.66 million Georgia
2030s 7.31 billion 5.43 billion 1.88 billion Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross international reserves, central bank, us dollar (balance of), Georgia or Kyrgyzstan?
Georgia, at 7.31 billion against 5.43 billion in Kyrgyzstan as of 2030.
What is the difference in gross international reserves, central bank, us dollar (balance of) between Georgia and Kyrgyzstan?
1.88 billion, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Kyrgyzstan?
31 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2030.
How do Georgia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for gross international reserves, central bank, us dollar (balance of)?
Georgia ranks 19th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 22nd of 29 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6)). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Kyrgyzstan: Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/gross-international-reserves-central-bank-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international/georgia/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/gross-international-reserves-central-bank-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international/georgia/kyrgyz-republic/">Georgia vs Kyrgyzstan: Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6))
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
42 places, 1,258 data points, 2000–2030
Last refreshed

The Middle East and Central Asia Department Regional Economic Outlook (MCDREO) provides information on recent economic developments and prospects for 32 countries and territories: Afghanistan, Algeria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Djibouti, Egypt, Georgia, Islamic Republic of Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, West Bank and Gaza, and Yemen. These countries and territories are divided into two main nonoverlapping groups, based on export earnings, namely (1) oil exporters; and (2) oil importers. The oil importers group comprises (1) emerging market and middle-income countries (EM&MI) and (2) low-income countries (LICs) based on the income level. Additional analytical and regional groups might be used to provide a more granular breakdown for analysis and continuity.