West Bank and Gaza vs Sudan: Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of)

West Bank and Gaza
1.33 billion
in 2024
Sudan
1.08 billion
in 2030
West Bank and Gaza rank
27th
Sudan rank
28th

Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of) over time

  • West Bank and Gaza
  • Sudan
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B2.5B200020152030

How they compare

West Bank and Gaza currently reports 1.33 billion against 1.08 billion in Sudan, a difference of 249.15 million.

That makes West Bank and Gaza's figure about 1.2 times Sudan's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was West Bank and Gaza ahead.

West Bank and Gaza ranks 27th and Sudan ranks 28th of 29 countries.

Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade West Bank and Gaza Sudan Difference Ahead
2000s 347.50 million 1.23 billion 878.22 million Sudan
2010s 558.88 million 659.06 million 100.19 million Sudan
2020s 1.02 billion 1.09 billion 71.27 million Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross international reserves, central bank, us dollar (balance of), West Bank and Gaza or Sudan?
West Bank and Gaza, at 1.33 billion against 1.08 billion in Sudan as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross international reserves, central bank, us dollar (balance of) between West Bank and Gaza and Sudan?
249.15 million, with West Bank and Gaza ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for West Bank and Gaza and Sudan?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do West Bank and Gaza and Sudan rank globally for gross international reserves, central bank, us dollar (balance of)?
West Bank and Gaza ranks 27th and Sudan ranks 28th of 29 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6)). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

West Bank and Gaza vs Sudan: Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/gross-international-reserves-central-bank-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international/item-9/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/gross-international-reserves-central-bank-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international/item-9/sudan/">West Bank and Gaza vs Sudan: Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6))
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
42 places, 1,258 data points, 2000–2030
Last refreshed

The Middle East and Central Asia Department Regional Economic Outlook (MCDREO) provides information on recent economic developments and prospects for 32 countries and territories: Afghanistan, Algeria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Djibouti, Egypt, Georgia, Islamic Republic of Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, West Bank and Gaza, and Yemen. These countries and territories are divided into two main nonoverlapping groups, based on export earnings, namely (1) oil exporters; and (2) oil importers. The oil importers group comprises (1) emerging market and middle-income countries (EM&MI) and (2) low-income countries (LICs) based on the income level. Additional analytical and regional groups might be used to provide a more granular breakdown for analysis and continuity.