Kyrgyzstan vs Tunisia: Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of)

Kyrgyzstan
5.43 billion
in 2030
Tunisia
4.21 billion
in 2030
Kyrgyzstan rank
22nd
Tunisia rank
24th

Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of) over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Tunisia
02.5B5.0B7.5B10.0B200020152030

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 5.43 billion against 4.21 billion in Tunisia, a difference of 1.21 billion.

That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.3 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Tunisia ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 22nd and Tunisia ranks 24th of 29 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Tunisia Difference Ahead
2000s 724.52 million 5.20 billion 4.48 billion Tunisia
2010s 1.96 billion 7.28 billion 5.32 billion Tunisia
2020s 4.41 billion 7.93 billion 3.52 billion Tunisia
2030s 5.43 billion 4.21 billion 1.21 billion Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross international reserves, central bank, us dollar (balance of), Kyrgyzstan or Tunisia?
Kyrgyzstan, at 5.43 billion against 4.21 billion in Tunisia as of 2030.
What is the difference in gross international reserves, central bank, us dollar (balance of) between Kyrgyzstan and Tunisia?
1.21 billion, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Tunisia?
31 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2030.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Tunisia rank globally for gross international reserves, central bank, us dollar (balance of)?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 22nd and Tunisia ranks 24th of 29 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6)). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Tunisia: Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/gross-international-reserves-central-bank-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international/kyrgyz-republic/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/gross-international-reserves-central-bank-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international/kyrgyz-republic/tunisia/">Kyrgyzstan vs Tunisia: Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6))
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
42 places, 1,258 data points, 2000–2030
Last refreshed

The Middle East and Central Asia Department Regional Economic Outlook (MCDREO) provides information on recent economic developments and prospects for 32 countries and territories: Afghanistan, Algeria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Djibouti, Egypt, Georgia, Islamic Republic of Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, West Bank and Gaza, and Yemen. These countries and territories are divided into two main nonoverlapping groups, based on export earnings, namely (1) oil exporters; and (2) oil importers. The oil importers group comprises (1) emerging market and middle-income countries (EM&MI) and (2) low-income countries (LICs) based on the income level. Additional analytical and regional groups might be used to provide a more granular breakdown for analysis and continuity.